Text Response Hub Logo

AI Text Analysis for Surveys, Reviews & Feedback

Text Response Hub

Insights Report

Decoding Human Cooperation: Understanding the Interplay of Social Norms, Reputation, and Cultural Dynamics

ANALYZER:Text Response Hub v.1.02
AI ENGINE:GPT-4o-mini
REPORT DATE:Sep 26, 2025

Global Insights

Most frequent themes across all responses:

27%
Human cooperation is influenced by social norms
24%
Reputation plays a critical role in promoting cooperation
22%
Individuals are motivated to cooperate based on social preferences
20%
Culture shapes cooperative behavior
20%
Trust and reciprocity are foundational to human cooperation
19%
Cooperation can be explained through evolutionary mechanisms
18%
Altruistic punishment helps sustain cooperation
17%
Group dynamics and competition impact levels of cooperation
15%
Intuition and emotional factors can influence cooperative behavior
15%
Moral judgments are key to understanding cooperative behavior

Percentages indicate the proportion of responses that explicitly address each theme. For example, 20 % means that roughly one in five responses discussed that topic. Because a single response can cover multiple themes, totals across themes may exceed 100%.

Per-Response Insights

ID
Response
Substance
1
Joseph Henrich, Michael Muthukrishna (2020). The Origins and Psychology of Human Cooperation. Annual Review of Psychology DOI link
9
2
Ernst Fehr, Ivo Schurtenberger (2018). Normative foundations of human cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour DOI link
8
3
Junhui Wu, Daniel Balliet, Paul A. M. Van Lange (2016). Reputation, Gossip, and Human Cooperation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass DOI link
8
4
Coren L. Apicella, Joan B. Silk (2019). The evolution of human cooperation. Current Biology DOI link
9
5
Adam Bear, David G. Rand (2016). Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
7
6
Jim A. C. Everett, David A. Pizarro, Molly J. Crockett (2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General DOI link
8
7
Sergey Gavrilets, Peter J. Richerson (2017). Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
8
8
Pete Trautman, Jeremy Ma, Richard M. Murray, Andreas Krause (2015). Robot navigation in dense human crowds: Statistical models and experimental studies of human–robot cooperation. The International Journal of Robotics Research DOI link
5
9
Michael Tomasello, Ivan Gonzalez-Cabrera (2017). The Role of Ontogeny in the Evolution of Human Cooperation. Human Nature DOI link
8
10
Friederike Range, Zsà fia Virányi (2015). Tracking the evolutionary origins of dog-human cooperation: the “Canine Cooperation Hypothesis”. Frontiers in Psychology DOI link
7
11
Jacob W. Crandall, Mayada Oudah, Tennom, Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko, Sherief Abdallah, Jean‐François Bonnefon, Manuel Cebrián, Azim Shariff, Michael A. Goodrich, Iyad Rahwan (2018). Cooperating with machines. Nature Communications DOI link
8
12
Anne Böckler, Anita Tusche, Tania Singer (2016). The Structure of Human Prosociality. Social Psychological and Personality Science DOI link
9
13
P. Kyle Stanford (2017). The difference between ice cream and Nazis: Moral externalization and the evolution of human cooperation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences DOI link
9
14
Felix Warneken (2017). How Children Solve the Two Challenges of Cooperation. Annual Review of Psychology DOI link
8
15
Paul A. M. Van Lange, Jeff Joireman, Manfred Milinski (2018). Climate Change: What Psychology Can Offer in Terms of Insights and Solutions. Current Directions in Psychological Science DOI link
8
16
Jörg Gross, Carsten K. W. De Dreu (2019). The rise and fall of cooperation through reputation and group polarization. Nature Communications DOI link
8
17
Paul A. M. Van Lange, David G. Rand (2021). Human Cooperation and the Crises of Climate Change, COVID-19, and Misinformation. Annual Review of Psychology DOI link
9
18
Chengyi Xia, Xiaopeng Li, Zhen Wang, Matjaž Perc (2018). Doubly effects of information sharing on interdependent network reciprocity. New Journal of Physics DOI link
8
19
Malini Suchak, Timothy M. Eppley, Matthew Campbell, Rebecca Feldman, Luke F. Quarles, Frans Β. Μ. de Waal (2016). How chimpanzees cooperate in a competitive world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
8
20
Ana Pesquita, Robert L. Whitwell, James T. Enns (2017). Predictive joint-action model: A hierarchical predictive approach to human cooperation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review DOI link
7
21
Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Joseph Henrich, Coren L. Apicella, Quentin D. Atkinson, Adam Baimel, Emma Cohen, Rita Anne McNamara, Aiyana K. Willard, Dimitris Xygalatas, Ara Norenzayan (2017). The evolution of religion and morality: a synthesis of ethnographic and experimental evidence from eight societies. Religion Brain & Behavior DOI link
9
22
Angelo Romano, Daniel Balliet (2017). Reciprocity Outperforms Conformity to Promote Cooperation. Psychological Science DOI link
8
23
Katherine A. Cronin, Daniel J. Acheson, Penélope Hernández, Ángel Sánchez (2015). Hierarchy is Detrimental for Human Cooperation. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
24
Juan Wang, Chengyi Xia (2023). Reputation evaluation and its impact on the human cooperation—A recent survey. EPL (Europhysics Letters) DOI link
8
25
Carles Boix (2015). Political order and inequality: their foundations and their consequences for human welfare. Choice Reviews Online DOI link
7
26
Celso M. de Melo, Stacy Marsella, Jonathan Gratch (2019). Human Cooperation When Acting Through Autonomous Machines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
8
27
Iman Faridmehr, Moncef L. Nehdi, Iraj Faraji Davoudkhani, Alireza Poolad (2023). Mountaineering Team-Based Optimization: A Novel Human-Based Metaheuristic Algorithm. Mathematics DOI link
7
28
Alessandro Di Stefano, Marialisa Scatá, Aurelio La Corte, Píetro Lió, Emanuele Catania, Ermanno Guardo, Salvatore Pagano (2015). Quantifying the Role of Homophily in Human Cooperation Using Multiplex Evolutionary Game Theory. PLoS ONE DOI link
9
29
Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson (2022). Large‐scale cooperation in small‐scale foraging societies. Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews DOI link
9
30
Daniel Major‐Smith (2020). Cultural group selection and human cooperation: a conceptual and empirical review. Evolutionary Human Sciences DOI link
8
31
Friederike Range, Caroline Ritter, Zsófia Virányi (2015). Testing the myth: tolerant dogs and aggressive wolves. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
8
32
Loukas Balafoutas, Nikos Nikiforakis, Bettina Rockenbach (2016). Altruistic punishment does not increase with the severity of norm violations in the field. Nature Communications DOI link
8
33
Troels Bøggild, Lene Aarøe, Michael Bang Petersen (2020). Citizens as Complicits: Distrust in Politicians and Biased Social Dissemination of Political Information. American Political Science Review DOI link
8
34
Artur Czeszumski, Sophie Hsin‐Yi Liang, Suzanne Dikker, Peter König, Chin‐Pang Lee, Sander L. Koole, Brent Kelsen (2022). Cooperative Behavior Evokes Interbrain Synchrony in the Prefrontal and Temporoparietal Cortex: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of fNIRS Hyperscanning Studies. eNeuro DOI link
9
35
Friederike Range, Sarah Marshall‐Pescini, Corinna Kratz, Zsófia Virányi (2019). Wolves lead and dogs follow, but they both cooperate with humans. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
36
Fernando P. Santos, Jorge M. Pacheco, Francisco C. Santos (2021). The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
8
37
Bailey R. House, Patricia Kanngießer, H. Clark Barrett, Süheyla Yilmaz, Andrew Smith, Carla Sebastián‐Enesco, Alejandro Erut, Joan B. Silk (2020). Social norms and cultural diversity in the development of third-party punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
8
38
Erik P. Willems, Carel P. van Schaik (2015). Collective action and the intensity of between-group competition in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology DOI link
8
39
Joan B. Silk, Bailey R. House (2016). The evolution of altruistic social preferences in human groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
9
40
David Melamed, Ashley Harrell, Brent Simpson (2018). Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
9
41
Jinming Du, Bin Wu, Long Wang (2015). Aspiration dynamics in structured population acts as if in a well-mixed one. Scientific Reports DOI link
7
42
Stéphane Debove, Jean‐Baptiste André, Nicolas Baumard (2015). Partner choice creates fairness in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
8
43
Dandan Zhang, Yiqin Lin, Yiming Jing, Chunliang Feng, Ruolei Gu (2019). The Dynamics of Belief Updating in Human Cooperation: Findings from inter-brain ERP hyperscanning. NeuroImage DOI link
8
44
Martin Schmelz, Sebastian Grueneisen, Alihan Kabalak, Jürgen Jost, Michael Tomasello (2017). Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
8
45
Sharon Alvarez, Sybille Sachs (2021). Where Do Stakeholders Come From?. Academy of Management Review DOI link
7
46
Ángel Sánchez (2018). Physics of human cooperation: experimental evidence and theoretical models. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment DOI link
8
47
Yasuhiro Kanakogi, Michiko Miyazaki, Hideyuki Takahashi, Hiroki Yamamoto, Tessei Kobayashi, Kazuo Hiraki (2022). Third-party punishment by preverbal infants. Nature Human Behaviour DOI link
8
48
Daniel B. Shank, Yoshihisa Kashima, Kim Peters, Yang Li, Garry Robins, Michael Kirley (2018). Norm talk and human cooperation: Can we talk ourselves into cooperation?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology DOI link
8
49
Yoonseo Zoh, Steve W. C. Chang, Molly J. Crockett (2021). The prefrontal cortex and (uniquely) human cooperation: a comparative perspective. Neuropsychopharmacology DOI link
9
50
Kaleda K. Denton, Yoav Ram, Uri Liberman, Marcus W. Feldman (2020). Cultural evolution of conformity and anticonformity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
8
51
Mylène Quervel-Chaumette, Rachel Dale, Sarah Marshall‐Pescini, Friederike Range (2015). Familiarity affects other-regarding preferences in pet dogs. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
52
Brandon Matthew Woo, Enda Tan, J. Kiley Hamlin (2022). Human Morality Is Based on an Early-Emerging Moral Core. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology DOI link
8
53
Gianluca Grimalda, Andreas Pondorfer, David P. Tracer (2016). Social image concerns promote cooperation more than altruistic punishment. Nature Communications DOI link
9
54
Cathryn Townsend, Athena Aktipis, Daniel Balliet, Lee Cronk (2020). Generosity among the Ik of Uganda. Evolutionary Human Sciences DOI link
9
55
Cédric Girard‐Buttoz, Martin Surbeck, Liran Samuni, Patrick Tkaczynski, Christophe Boesch, Barbara Fruth, Roman M. Wittig, Gottfried Hohmann, Catherine Crockford (2020). Information transfer efficiency differs in wild chimpanzees and bonobos, but not social cognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
8
56
Sarah Mathew (2017). How the Second-Order Free Rider Problem Is Solved in a Small-Scale Society. American Economic Review DOI link
8
57
Louise Goupil, Emmanuel Ponsot, Daniel C. Richardson, Gabriel Reyes, Jean‐Julien Aucouturier (2021). Listeners’ perceptions of the certainty and honesty of a speaker are associated with a common prosodic signature. Nature Communications DOI link
8
58
Fabia Miss, Judith M. Burkart (2018). Corepresentation During Joint Action in Marmoset Monkeys (<i>Callithrix jacchus</i>). Psychological Science DOI link
8
59
John Tooby, Leda Cosmides (2016). Human cooperation shows the distinctive signatures of adaptations to small-scale social life. Behavioral and Brain Sciences DOI link
7
60
Ozan İşler, John Maule, Chris Starmer (2018). Is intuition really cooperative? Improved tests support the social heuristics hypothesis. PLoS ONE DOI link
9
61
Sebastian Lotz (2015). Spontaneous Giving under Structural Inequality: Intuition Promotes Cooperation in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas. PLoS ONE DOI link
9
62
Giuliana Spadaro, Ilaria Tiddi, Simon Columbus, Shuxian Jin, Annette ten Teije, Daniel Balliet (2022). The Cooperation Databank: Machine-Readable Science Accelerates Research Synthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science DOI link
9
63
Henrik Skaug Sætra (2021). Social robot deception and the culture of trust. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics DOI link
8
64
Alexander Erlei, Franck Nekdem, Lukas Meub, Avishek Anand, Ujwal Gadiraju (2020). Impact of Algorithmic Decision Making on Human Behavior: Evidence from Ultimatum Bargaining. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing DOI link
8
65
Laura Kaltwasser, Andrea Hildebrandt, Oliver Wilhelm, Werner Sommer (2016). Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience DOI link
8
66
Isamu Okada, Tatsuya Sasaki, Yutaka Nakai (2018). A solution for private assessment in indirect reciprocity using solitary observation. Journal of Theoretical Biology DOI link
8
67
Celso M. de Melo, Kazunori Terada (2020). The interplay of emotion expressions and strategy in promoting cooperation in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
68
Philip Pärnamets, Anastasia Shuster, Diego A. Reinero, Jay Joseph Van Bavel (2020). A Value-Based Framework for Understanding Cooperation. Current Directions in Psychological Science DOI link
9
69
F. Richard Yu (2021). From Information Networking to Intelligence Networking: Motivations, Scenarios, and Challenges. IEEE Network DOI link
8
70
Brian M. Bird, Shawn N. Geniole, Tanya L. Procyshyn, Triana L. Ortiz, Justin M. Carré, Neil V. Watson (2018). Effect of exogenous testosterone on cooperation depends on personality and time pressure. Neuropsychopharmacology DOI link
8
71
Petra Dobos, Péter Pongrácz (2023). Would You Detour with Me? Association between Functional Breed Selection and Social Learning in Dogs Sheds Light on Elements of Dog–Human Cooperation. Animals DOI link
8
72
Christopher Caulcrick, Weiguang Huo, Enrico Franco, Samer Mohammed, Will Hoult, Ravi Vaidyanathan (2021). Model Predictive Control for Human-Centred Lower Limb Robotic Assistance. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics DOI link
7
73
Arnaud Tognetti, Dimitri Dubois, Charlotte Faurie, Marc Willinger (2016). Men increase contributions to a public good when under sexual competition. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
74
Yali Dong, Tatsuya Sasaki, Boyu Zhang (2019). The competitive advantage of institutional reward. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
9
75
Mehdi Moussaïd, Mareike Trauernicht (2016). Patterns of cooperation during collective emergencies in the help-or-escape social dilemma. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
76
Amanda Höglin, Enya Van Poucke, Rebecca Katajamaa, Per Jensen, Elvar Theodorsson, Lina S. V. Roth (2021). Long-term stress in dogs is related to the human–dog relationship and personality traits. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
77
Daniel Clark, Drew Fudenberg, Alexander Wolitzky (2020). Indirect reciprocity with simple records. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
9
78
William H.B. McAuliffe, Daniel E. Forster, Eric J. Pedersen, Michael E. McCullough (2018). Does Cooperation in the Laboratory Reflect the Operation of A Broad Trait?. European Journal of Personality DOI link
8
79
Katherine McAuliffe, Richard W. Wrangham, Luke Glowacki, Andrew F. Russell (2015). When cooperation begets cooperation: the role of key individuals in galvanizing support. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
8
80
Alexander Ehlert, Martin Kindschi, René Algesheimer, Heiko Rauhut (2020). Human social preferences cluster and spread in the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI link
9
81
Nikhil Chaudhary, Gül Deniz Salalι, James Thompson, Aude Rey, Pascale Gerbault, Edward G.J. Stevenson, Mark Dyble, Abigail E. Page, Daniel Major‐Smith, Ruth Mace, Lucio Vinicius, Andrea Bamberg Migliano (2016). Competition for Cooperation: variability, benefits and heritability of relational wealth in hunter-gatherers. Scientific Reports DOI link
9
82
Toshio Yamagishi, Yang Li, Alan S. R. Fermin, Ryota Kanai, Haruto Takagishi, Yoshie Matsumoto, Toko Kiyonari, Masamichi Sakagami (2017). Behavioural Differences and Neural Substrates of Altruistic and Spiteful Punishment. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
83
Jim A. C. Everett, David A. Pizarro, Molly J. Crockett (2016). Inference of Trustworthiness from Intuitive Moral Judgments. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI link
9
84
Vincent Théroude, Adam Zylbersztejn (2019). Cooperation in a risky world. Journal of Public Economic Theory DOI link
8
85
Burton Voorhees, Dwight Read, Liane Gabora (2020). Identity, Kinship, and the Evolution of Cooperation. Current Anthropology DOI link
9
86
Maithri Sivaraman, Dermot Barnes‐Holmes, R. Douglas Greer, Daniel M. Fienup, Herbert Roeyers (2023). Verbal behavior development theory and relational frame theory: Reflecting on similarities and differences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior DOI link
8
87
Giuliana Spadaro, Shuxian Jin, Daniel Balliet (2022). Gender differences in cooperation across 20 societies: a meta-analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
8
88
Emma Levine, Alixandra Barasch, David G. Rand, Jonathan Berman, Deborah A. Small (2017). Signaling Emotion and Reason in Cooperation. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI link
8
89
Hanna Kokko (2017). Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
8
90
Randolph M. Nesse (2016). Social selection is a powerful explanation for prosociality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences DOI link
9
91
Catherine Molho, Junhui Wu (2021). Direct punishment and indirect reputation-based tactics to intervene against offences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
9
92
Lynne Murphy, Jacqueline D. Wilson, Stacey Greenberg (2017). Equine-Assisted Experiential Learning in Occupational Therapy Education. Journal of Experiential Education DOI link
8
93
Virgilia Toccaceli, Corrado Fagnani, Nancy Eisenberg, Guido Alessandri, Augusto Vitale, Maria Antonietta Stazi (2018). Adult Empathy: Possible Gender Differences in Gene-Environment Architecture for Cognitive and Emotional Components in a Large Italian Twin Sample. Twin Research and Human Genetics DOI link
8
94
Szabolcs Számadó, Ferenc Szalai, István Scheuring (2016). Deception Undermines the Stability of Cooperation in Games of Indirect Reciprocity. PLoS ONE DOI link
9
95
Noa Truskanov, Yasmin Emery, Redouan Bshary (2020). Juvenile cleaner fish can socially learn the consequences of cheating. Nature Communications DOI link
9
96
Giada Cordoni, Elisabetta Palagi (2019). Back to the Future: A Glance Over Wolf Social Behavior to Understand Dog–Human Relationship. Animals DOI link
8
97
Kasper Otten, Vincent Buskens, Wojtek Przepiorka, Naomi Ellemers (2020). Heterogeneous groups cooperate in public good problems despite normative disagreements about individual contribution levels. Scientific Reports DOI link
8
98
Catherine C. Eckel, Enrique Fatás, Sara Godoy, Rick K. Wilson (2016). Group-Level Selection Increases Cooperation in the Public Goods Game. PLoS ONE DOI link
9
99
Bailey R. House (2016). Diverse ontogenies of reciprocal and prosocial behavior: cooperative development in Fiji and the United States. Developmental Science DOI link
8
100
Redouan Bshary, Nichola Raihani (2017). Helping in humans and other animals: a fruitful interdisciplinary dialogue. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences DOI link
9

Join the Mission

Keep Text Response Hub Free & Independent

Report generated by Text Response Hub. Browse other Insights Reports.

Disclaimer: This report was generated using AI-based analysis and is provided for informational purposes. While it highlights patterns and themes in the dataset, some nuance may be missed, and interpretations can vary. Readers should evaluate the findings critically, and Text Response Hub is not responsible for decisions made based on this report.